In the Interests of S.L.W. ex rel. A.W. v. A.K.
North Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
CROTHERS, Justice.
[¶ 1] A.K. (“Adam”)1 appealed from a district court order declaring him to be the biological father of S.L.W. (“Sara”) and ordering him to pay child support. We affirm.
*329I
[¶2] A.W. (“Amanda”), the biological mother of Sara, was married to C.W. (“Charles”) when Sara was born in 1991. Amanda and Charles divorced in 1996, and the divorce judgment ordered Charles to pay child support for Sara. In 2004, Charles moved to disestablish his paternity of Sara. After genetic testing established that Charles was not Sara’s biological father, judgment was entered declaring Charles was not…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Linrud v. LinrudNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Farmers Union Oil Co. of Garrison v. SmetanaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2009
- Geinert v. GeinertNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- Richter v. HouserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- Richter v. HouserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Interest of MaedcheNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2010
- Zink v. Enzminger Steel, LLCNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- Application of BjerkeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2011
- State v. WolfgramNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2012