Legal Opinion

Beardsley v. Webber

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 12, 1895PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Error to Kent. (Grove, J.) Assumpsit. Defendant Webber brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

Defendants were bankers. Plaintiff deposited with them $8,000, «for which ,he received the following certificate;

“Bank of Webber & Chapin.
“Stanton, Mich., Oct. 26, 1892.
“G. F. Beardsley has deposited in this bank $8,000 (eight thousand dollars), payable to the order of himself on the return of this certificate properly indorsed. *89Interest at 6 per cent, if left 12 months for all full months. Interest to cease if not renewed at end of one year from date.”

July 26, 1893, the bank closed its doors, having previously suspended payment. Plaintiff testified that he presented the certificate and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Cate v. PattersonMichigan Supreme Court · 1872
  2. Nye v. LothropMichigan Supreme Court · 1892

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. Bankers Life Ass'n of Des MoinesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1899
  2. Citizens' Savings Bank v. VaughanMichigan Supreme Court · 1897
  3. Union Guardian Trust Co. v. EmeryMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Wolfe v. A. E. Kusterer & Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1934
  5. White v. WadhamsMichigan Supreme Court · 1918

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API