South Delta Water Agency v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
PREGERSON, Circuit Judge:
Federal defendants brought this interlocutory appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to dismiss plaintiffs’ suit for declaratory and injunctive relief. For the reasons stated below, we affirm the district court’s denial of the defendants’ motion to dismiss.
FACTS
This appeal involves the federal defendants’ operation of the Central Valley Project (CVP), the nation’s largest water reclamation project.1
The California legislature originally conceived of the CVP “to conserve and put to maximum beneficial use the waters of the Central Valley of California.”…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Califano v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Werner R. Staacke v. United States Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- South Delta Water Agency v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- The Fund For Animals, Inc. v. LujanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Hermil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1988
- Baer v. AbelDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 1986
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.