Legal Opinion

Hutchins v. Swinton

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 23, 1940No. Civil No. 4246PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLockwood, J.

Norman E. Swinton, hereinafter called plaintiff, filed a petition in the superior court of Maricopa county for a writ of mandamus against W. R. Hutchins, as state highway engineer, hereinafter called defendant, commanding him to approve and pay a certain claim of $766.78 for wages alleged to be due plaintiff from the Arizona state highway department. The matter came on for hearing before the court, which finally issued a peremptory writ directing defendant to approve and pay the claim of plaintiff in the sum of $261.80, and this appeal was taken.

There is no serious dispute as to the facts…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. City of Phoenix v. KiddArizona Supreme Court · 1939
  2. State of Arizona v. AngleArizona Supreme Court · 1940

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Arizona Ass'n of Providers for Persons with Disabilities v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  2. Christensen v. PryorArizona Supreme Court · 1953
  3. ARIZONA ASSOCIATION OF PROVIDERS v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2009
  4. Christensen v. PryorArizona Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API