Legal Opinion · Dissent

Estate of Hamm v. Jenkins

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 17, 1975No. 363Published

1DissentRobert W. Hansen, J.

The will of the aged and partially paralyzed testator, executed on April 4, 1970, devised 90 percent of the near-million-dollar estate to the testator’s male nurse-attendant and his brother.1 The will, admitted to probate by the trial court, is challenged on the ground of undue influence.

Ordinarily the test as to undue influence on a testator is fourfold: (1) Was there opportunity to influence? (2) Was there a disposition to influence? (3) Was there susceptibility to influence? and (4) Was a coveted result obtained? 2

*297However, where the relationship between the testator and principal…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Patterson v. JensenWisconsin Supreme Court · 1944
  2. Tesch v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Cole v. GetzingerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1897
  4. Cooper v. ZoldWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Winn v. ItzelWisconsin Supreme Court · 1905

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API