Legal Opinion
Feldman v. Thew Shovel Co.
Court of Appeals of Maryland
Decided September 12, 2001No. [No. 12, September Term, 1957.]PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCollins, J.
This case involves the question of whether a foreign corporation was “doing business” in Maryland, within the meaning of Code, 1951, Article 23, Section 88 (a).
On August 17, 1953, Sebastian Perrera was injured by the fall of a boom of a Lorain Mobile Crane owned and operated by Arundel Crane Service, Inc., (Arundel). Perrera originally instituted suit against Arundel in the Circuit Court for Anne Arundel County. There, Arundel endeavored to make the Thew Shovel Company, a body corporate, (Thew), a third party defendant on the alleged ground that the Lorain Crane had been purchased from Thew…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Compania De Astral, S. A. v. Boston Metals Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1954
- Holzer v. . Dodge BrothersNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Johns v. Bay State Abrasive Products Co.District Court, D. Maryland · 1950
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Litsinger Sign Co. v. American Sign Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1967
- Snyder v. Hampton Industries, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1981
- Gilliam v. Moog Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1965
- Chesapeake Supply & Equipment Co. v. Manitowoc Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1963
- S.A.S. Personnel Consultants, Inc. v. Pat-Pan, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1979
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.