Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Sedillo v. Sargent

New Mexico Supreme Court

Decided March 5, 1918No. 2136PublishedCited by 19 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Santa Fe County; Hollo-man, Judge. Mandamus by tbe State of New Mexico, on relation of A. A. Sedillo, against William G. Sargent, State Auditor. Judgment for relator, and defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE' COURT.

ROBERTS, J.

A. A. Sedillo,- applied to William G. Sargent, state auditor of New Mexico, 'for a warrant for tbe sum of $1,500 authorized to be paid to tbe said Sedillo under tbe provisions of chapter 28 of tbe Laws of 1917. Tbe auditor refused ti> issue such warrant on tbe ground that tbe said chapter was an unconstitutional enactment. Sedillo thereupon applied to tbe district court of Santa Fe county for a writ of mandamus to compel tbe auditor to draw .the warrant. Tbe auditor made a return'to Sedillo’s .application, setting up tbe invalidity of tbe act. . The trial…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Clement v. SpruanceSupreme Court of Colorado · 1885
  2. Carpenter v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1876
  3. Robinson v. DunnCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. State v. SmithNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Zancanelli v. Central Coal & Coke Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Asplund v. AlaridNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1923
  4. State Ex Rel. Hannah v. ArmijoNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1933
  5. State v. WadeNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1983

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API