Legal Opinion

Smillie v. Continental Oil Company

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided December 13, 1954No. Civ. A. 4617PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

KNOUS, Chief Judge.

Herein the defendant has interposed a motion to dismiss upon the ground that the complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted.

After alleging that the business of the defendant, among other things, consists of “distributing and dealing in petroleum products,” the complaint further charges that “on or about the ninth day of November, 1953, defendant removed certain underground metal tanks, located closely adjacent to the wells of the Town of Granby, hereinbefore described, which tanks were filled, or partially filled with kerosene or other petroleum…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Helms v. Eastern Kansas Oil Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. City of Denver v. SpencerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1905
  3. Hauck v. Tidewater Pipe Line Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1893
  4. G., B. & L. R'y Co. v. EaglesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1886
  5. McMillan v. KeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. v. Colorado Department of Public Health and EnvironmentColorado Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API