Legal Opinion
Heyduck v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)
Decided July 11, 1991No. 01-90-00995-CRPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
O’CONNOR, Justice.
This Court is asked to decide whether a conviction for driving while intoxicated, after an earlier conviction based on speeding, violates double jeopardy. We hold it does not and we affirm.
On July 14, 1990, two troopers of the Department of Public Safety saw Richard Allen Heyduck, the appellant, speeding, stopped him, and issued him a citation for speeding. After questioning the appellant, the troopers decided he was drunk and arrested him for driving while intoxicated (DWI).
On October 8, 1990, the appellant was found guilty of speeding. On October 11, 1990, before…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Blockburger v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Phillips v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Solis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1990
- Johnson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Ex Parte Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1995
- Parrish v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Ex parte GeorgeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1994
- Guerrero v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1995
- Hernandez v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.