Legal Opinion

Keating v. City of New London

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided May 29, 1926PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMaltbie, J.

The plaintiff brought her action to recover damages for injuries sustained, as she alleged, by reason of a fall upon a sidewalk in the defendant city, claiming that the sidewalk was in a defective condition because of ice and snow upon it. The original appeal is taken from the refusal of the trial court to set aside a verdict rendered in the plaintiff’s favor. It is somewhat difficult to understand the testimony of the witnesses as to the place upon the sidewalk where she fell, because they so largely illustrated it by reference to exhibits, but we certainly cannot say that the jury could not…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Frechette v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926
  2. Vinci v. O'NeillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1925
  3. Carl v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1919
  4. Congdon v. City of NorwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1870
  5. Schroeder v. City of HartfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Willoughby v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1937
  2. Moleske v. MacDonaldSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
  3. Kristiansen v. City of DanburySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  4. Ziskin v. ConfiettoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1951
  5. Shuchat v. Town of StratfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1939

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API