Legal Opinion

Diking District No. 2 v. Calispel Duck Club

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1941No. 27916PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, C. J.

This is an action to enjoin the maintenance of a dam. Respondent is the owner of a fifteen hundred acre tract of land in the valley of the Calispel river, in Pend Oreille county, Washington, on which is situated a body of water called Calispel lake. Respondent, since 1907, has maintained a dam across the outlet of the lake, and has used the lake as a wild fowl resort and for the purposes of a duck hunting club. The property represents a capital outlay in excess of seventy thousand dollars, and an even greater sum has been spent on its upkeep during the more than thirty years of its existence.…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Swan v. MunchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1896
  2. Watkins v. DorrisWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Gartlan v. C. A. Hooper & Co.California Supreme Court · 1918
  4. A. C. Conn Co. v. Little Suamico Lumber Manufacturing Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1889
  5. State ex rel. Davis v. Superior CourtWashington Supreme Court · 1915

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API