Legal Opinion

Kadow v. Paul

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 20, 1925No. 19131. En BancPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought by the owners of certain lands in diking improvement district No. 3 of Clarke county, of this state, against the commissioners of that county, the county engineer, and the supervisors of the district and the engineer specially employed. The relief asked was a decree adjudging that the proceedings had in the organization of the district were void and that certain portions of the statute under which the district organized were unconstitutional, and restraining the defendants from taking any steps looking to the construction of the proposed improvement or sale of bonds to…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Hagar v. Reclamation District No. 108Supreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Holzman v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Rands v. Clarke CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  4. State ex rel. Clancy v. Columbia Irrigation DistrictWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Carstens & Earles, Inc. v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1915

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Wells v. HartungWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  2. Kruesel v. CollinWashington Supreme Court · 1932
  3. Wm. D. Perkins & Co. v. Diking District No. 3Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Boyd v. CunninghamWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Anderson v. O'BRIENWashington Supreme Court · 1974

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API