Hustina v. Indian Refining Co.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMcDonald, J.
This action is in ejectment and involves a strip of land on the boundary line between lots'4 and 5 of Baldwin’s addition to the city of Pontiac. From a judgment entered on a verdict for the plaintiff, the defendant has appealed. On a former trial plaintiff also recovered a judgment which was reviewed and reversed by this court in 210 Mich. 537, where the facts are fully stated. It was there held that the verdict was against the great weight of the evidence. The record in the instant case presents the same question raised by motion for a new trial, exceptions and assignments.
*371The plaintiffs are…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bernard v. Grand Rapids Paper Box Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Brassel v. Minneapolis, St. Paul & Sault Ste. Marie Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Crowe v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Hustina v. Indian Refining Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by2 opinions
- Hanlon v. Ten HoveMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
- Kahn-Reiss, Inc. v. Detroit & Northern Savings & Loan Ass'nMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975