Legal Opinion

Lecours v. Lecours

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided March 8, 2002No. 2000-240-APublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Court for oral argument on February 4, 2002, pursuant to an order that directed both parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised by this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the arguments of counsel and examining the memoranda filed by the parties, we are of the opinion that cause has not been shown and that the issues raised by this appeal should be decided at this time. The facts pertinent to this appeal are as follows.

The defendant, Norman E. Lecours (defendant), appeals from a Family Court trial justice’s order, finding him in…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Riffenburg v. RiffenburgSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1991
  2. Johnston v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  3. Donelan v. DonelanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999
  4. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. Attilli v. AttilliSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1999

4Cited by3 opinions

  1. Gorman v. GormanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Esposito v. EspositoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2012
  3. Smart v. SmartSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API