Legal Opinion
Donelan v. Donelan
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided December 2, 1999No. 97-615-AppealPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
2Per curiam
The defendant, James M. Donelan (James), appeals from a Family Court order that divided a Keogh retirement account (the Keogh account or the retirement account) equally between himself and his former wife, the plaintiff, Kathleen Kelly (Kathleen). 1 James contends that the Family Court’s order improperly modified a non-merged property settlement agreement between himself and Kathleen. He further argues that the Family Court justice erred by granting Kathleen a half share of the retirement account’s accumulated interest in addition to granting Kathleen one half of the retirement…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Westinghouse Broadcasting Co. v. Dial Media, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Gott v. NorbergSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1980
- Bristol and Warren Gas Co. v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1985
- Vickers Antone v. VickersSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
- Flynn v. FlynnSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by9 opinions
- Dubis v. East Greenwich Fire DistrictSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Paul v. PaulSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- City of Providence v. Employee Retirement BoardSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Marcia Sallum Glassie v. Paul Doucette, in his capacity as of the Estate of Donelson C. Glassie, Jr.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2017
- Lecours v. LecoursSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.