Legal Opinion

Riffenburg v. Riffenburg

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided January 16, 1991No. 89-402-AppealPublishedCited by 30 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

MURRAY, Justice.

This case is before us on the plaintiff’s petition for common-law certiorari. 1 Two main issues are presented. First, does the Family Court have authority to modify alimony obligations as set out in a separation agreement, where the agreement has been incorporated by reference but not merged into a final divorce judgment? For the reasoning that follows, we rule that the Family Court lacks such authority. Second, when alimony is provided both in a nonmerged separation agreement and in a divorce judgment, is alimony under the judgment modifiable despite the fact that the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Kleila v. KleilaNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Knox v. RemickMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1976
  3. Johnston v. JohnstonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1983
  4. Ballin v. BallinNevada Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Binder v. BinderMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Dressler v. Dressler (In Re Dressler)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Gorman v. GormanSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  3. Rubano v. DiCenzoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  4. Andrukiewicz v. AndrukiewiczSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2004
  5. Zaino v. ZainoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API