Legal Opinion
Pullman, Incorporated v. Phoenix Steel Corporation
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided February 9, 1973PublishedCited by 32 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WRIGHT, Judge.
Defendant, Phoenix Steel Corporation, a Delaware corporation (Phoenix), has moved for summary judgment in this action for declaratory judgment brought by Pullman, Incorporated, also a Delaware corporation (Pullman). The issue is whether or not a State court must apply the United States Arbitration Act, 9 U.S.C. §§ 1-14 (1970), in cases before it involving contracts which touch or concern interstate or foreign commerce.
Summary judgment may be granted only where, considering the facts in a light most favorable to the non-moving party, there is no material issue of fact and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Robert Lawrence Company, Inc. v. Devonshire Fabrics, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
- American Airlines, Inc., Trans World Airlines, Inc., Eastern Air Lines, Inc. v. Louisville and Jefferson County Air BoardCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1959
- Electrical Research Products, Inc. v. Vitaphone Corp.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1934
- Nathan Miller, Inc. v. Northern InsuranceSuperior Court of Delaware · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- World Films, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures Corp.Supreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1990
- Burke County Public Schools Board of Education v. Shaver PartnershipSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
- Walborg Corp. v. Tribunal Superior de Puerto RicoSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1975
- Ex Parte Alabama Oxygen Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1983
- MERRILL LYNCH PIERCE, ETC. v. MelamedDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.