Foster v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WALKER, Chief Justice.
This is an appeal from a conviction for the felony offense of Robbery. Enhancement paragraphs in the indictment raised appellant’s status to that of an habitual offender. Appellant pleaded guilty to the alleged offense before the jury. Testimony was elicited from several State’s witnesses. Appellant called no witnesses nor did he testify in his own behalf. Appellant pleaded “true” to all eight enhancement allegations. After finding appellant guilty, the jury assessed punishment at fifty (50) years confinement in the Institutional Division of the Texas Department…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Alejandro v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Webb v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1976
- Allridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1988
- Ex Parte GibauitchCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1985
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Mitchell v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Rodgers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
- Eugene Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
- Eugene Ruiz v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2001
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.