Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 5, 1993No. 6-92-107-CRPublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CORNELIUS, Chief Justice.

Keith Edward Mitchell was convicted on his plea of guilty to aggravated robbery. Punishment, enhanced by a prior conviction, was set by the trial judge at fifteen years’ confinement.

In this appeal, Mitchell first contends that the State failed to properly prove the prior conviction used for enhancement purposes. He argues that the packet introduced by the State to prove the conviction does not contain a copy of the judgment and sentence as is required for proof of the conviction under the provisions of Tex.Penal Code Ann. § 12.42 (Vernon 1974 & Supp.1993).

The…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Langston v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Sims v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1990
  3. Morales v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  4. Foster v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1991
  5. Tomas v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. McLendon v. Texas Department of Public Safety, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)1998
  2. Dixon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  3. Martin v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2007
  4. Rodgers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1995
  5. Derrick Caldwell v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1999

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API