Legal Opinion
Holden v. Cenpatico Behavioral Health, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided September 22, 2017No. Civil Action No. 15-14119-JCBPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
A. Holden's Pay
Cenpatico maintains that Holden was paid her salary regardless of how many hours she worked each week.12 However, Cenpatico's Rule 30(b)(6) designee, Ms. Muldoon,13 testified that if Holden took more than four hours off and had depleted her vacation, sick and personal time, she would have to make up those hours or they would be deducted from her pay.14 Nevertheless, she also testified that she does not recall any such deductions being made to Holden's pay and that no such deductions were made to other utilization managers' pay during her tenure.15
Cenpatico's "Pay Procedures and…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Maria De Los Angeles SANCHEZ, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Carlos ALVARADO, Et Al., Defendants, AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Dana Blackie v. State of MaineCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Douglas T. Wightman v. Springfield Terminal Railway Company and United Transportation UnionCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Cox v. Maine State PoliceCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2004
- Ahern v. ShinsekiCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. Capital Vision Services, LLCDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2024
- FINN v. CUP 4 CUP LLCDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2023