Legal Opinion
In Re Dane K. Fisher and Raghunath v. Lalgudi
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 7, 2005No. 04-1465PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Chief Judge MICHEL.
Dissenting opinion filed by Circuit Judge RADER.
MICHEL, Chief Judge.
Dane K. Fisher and Raghunath Lalgudi (collectively “Fisher”)1 appeal from the decision of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTO”) Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) affirming the examiner’s final rejection of the only pending claim of application Serial No. 09/619,-*1367643 (the “ ’643 application”), entitled “Nucleic Acid Molecules and Other Molecules Associated with Plants,” as unpatentable for lack of utility under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and lack of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- In Re Robert J. Gartside and Richard C. NortonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Molins Plc, and John Coventry Smith, Jr. v. Textron, Inc., Kearney & Trecker Corporation, and Avco CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Amgen, Inc., Plaintiff/cross-Appellant v. Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and Genetics Institute, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Brenner v. MansonSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re Patrick H. O'farrell, Barry A. Polisky and David H. GelfandCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Banks v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
- Janssen Pharmaceutica N.V. v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
- In Re: SmithCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Grunenthal Gmbh v. Alkem Laboratories LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
- In Re Brimonidine Patent LitigationDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2009
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.