State v. Osborne
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ANDERSON, G. Barry, Justice.
Appellant Ricky A. Osborne asserts that the district court abused its discretion when it revoked his probation. The court based its revocation decision on Osborne’s daily marijuana use, juvenile record, and failure to contact probation authorities. The court of appeals affirmed. We affirm.
In 2001, the Rochester Police Department conducted numerous controlled buys of crack cocaine from Osborne. Two individuals also reported that Osborne and an accomplice robbed them of $700 at gunpoint. Osborne, then 18 years old, was certified as an adult and charged with…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. AustinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- State v. ModtlandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2005
- In Re the Welfare of C.D.L.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
3Cited by13 opinions
- State v. BarrientosSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2013
- State v. J.E.S.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2009
- State of Minnesota v. Anthony Roger ProutCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Darren Lee WhitelowCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- State of Minnesota v. Kamal Elyas MaqadinCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2016
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.