Legal Opinion
State v. Caez
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided November 25, 1963PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
81 N.J. Super. 315 (1963)
195 A.2d 496
THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
PEDRO CAEZ, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued October 21, 1963.
Decided November 25, 1963.
Before Judges GAULKIN, FOLEY and LEWIS.
Mr. Benedict E. Lucchi argued the cause for the defendant (Mr. Donald R. Conway, on the brief).
Mr. Bruce H. Losche argued the cause for the plaintiff.
The opinion of the court was delivered by GAULKIN, S.J.A.D.
Defendant was convicted of "loitering," in violation of an ordinance of the City of Hackensack, and he appeals.
Defendant argues that…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- People v. GalpernNew York Court of Appeals · 1932
- People v. NixonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- School Committee of Cambridge v. Superintendent of SchoolsMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1946
- Pinkerton v. VerbergMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
- City of St. Louis v. GlonerSupreme Court of Missouri · 1908
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- City of Seattle v. DrewWashington Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. LashinskySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1979
- City of Seattle v. JonesWashington Supreme Court · 1971
- Hayes v. Municipal Court of Oklahoma CityCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1971
- Hudson Circle Servicenter, Inc. v. KearnySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.