Legal Opinion
Price v. Price
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 6, 1966No. Civ. 612PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtConley, P. J.
The answer to the following question must control the outcome of this appeal: does the nunc pro tunc date of an interlocutory divorce decree, or the actual calendar date on which it is entered, control the application of the conclusive presumption that a child born in wedlock is the issue of the husband?
Plaintiff, born March 25, 1962, sued the defendant, Roy Price, through her guardian ad litem, Vay Vawter (who is also her mother) alleging that he is her father and that he fails and refuses to provide for her support and education; it is alleged that her mother and father were not married to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Heiner v. DonnanSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Schlesinger v. WisconsinSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Kusior v. SilverCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- Chatham v. MillsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902
- Estate of WalkerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1919
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Vincent B. v. Joan R.California Court of Appeal · 1981
- Kern v. KernCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Estate of CasimirCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1971
- Waller v. WallerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970