United States v. Edward Hanousek, Jr.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge:
Edward Hanousek, Jr., appeals his conviction and sentence for negligently discharging a harmful quantity of oil into a navigable water of the United States, in violation of the Clean Water Act, 33 U.S.C. §§ 1319(c)(1)(A) & 1321(b)(3). Hanousek contends that the district court erred: (1) by failing to instruct the jury that the government must prove that he acted with criminal negligence as opposed to ordinary negligence, (2) by failing to instruct the jury that he could not be found vicariously liable, (3) by failing to instruct the jury properly on causation,…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Morissette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Russello v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Consumer Product Safety Commission v. GTE Sylvania, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Richards v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Staples v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- United States v. Fred James Lemay, IIICourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Pineda-DovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Technic Services, Inc. And Rick RushingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. HatfieldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2010
- California ex rel. Lockyer v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.