Legal Opinion

Moffitt v. Moffitt

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 13, 1933No. Docket No. 1007PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN ZANTE, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendant Arthur C. Moffitt from a judgment granting plaintiff Martha Moffitt a decree of separate maintenance, without divorce, on the ground of desertion. These parties intermarried May 10, 1885, and resided together in the state of Indiana for a period of approximately twenty years, or until about the twenty-sixth day of March, 1904, when defendant, with another woman, and without the knowledge or consent of plaintiff, came to- California and lived in this state under the assumed name of C. A. Maple. Here he accumulated considerable property.

In…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brown v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Taylor v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Percy v. PercyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922
  4. Abbott v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
  5. McMullin v. McMullinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Melny v. MelnyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  2. Carmichael v. CarmichaelCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. Hager v. HagerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1959
  4. Hayhurst v. HayhurstNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Bernstein v. BernsteinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API