Legal Opinion
Boyd v. Benton County
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 28, 2004No. Nos. 02-35776, 02-35777PublishedCited by 151 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GONZALEZ, District Judge:
Kristianne Boyd brought suit under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against members of the Corvallis Police Department (“CPD”) and the City of Corvallis (the “City”) (together the “City defendants”) and members of the Benton County SWAT Team and Benton County (together the “County defendants”) (collectively, “Defendants”) for vio*776lation of her Fourth Amendment rights during the execution of a search warrant. Specifically, Boyd argues that the use of a “flash-bang” device constituted excessive force under the circumstances. The flash-bang grenade is a lighVsound diversionary device…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Hope v. PelzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by151 opinions
- Ellen Keates v. Michael KoileCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- John Benavidez v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Mattos v. AgaranoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Shane Horton v. City of Santa MariaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
- Torres v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
146 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.