Legal Opinion

Rogers v. Myers

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 28, 2008No. SC S055425PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*221DURHAM, J.

Petitioner challenges the ballot title for Initiative Petition 133 (2008). ORS 250.085(5) (describing procedure for challenging Attorney General’s certified ballot title). We agree with parts of petitioner’s challenge and, therefore, refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

Initiative Petition 133 (2008), if adopted, would require the Attorney General to assist counties and cities in the “establish [ing] and strengthening of Meth Strike Forces” at city, county, or regional levels, and to assign lawyers from the Department of Justice to assist the strike forces…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kain/Waller v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Dale v. KulongoskiOregon Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Earls v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Terhune v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Novick v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lavey v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Dixon / Frohnmayer v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2014
  3. Caruthers v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  4. Rogers v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Rogers v. Myers (Order Granting Motion to Dimiss as Moot)Oregon Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API