Israel v. Gale
Supreme Court of the United States
ERROR TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. The case is stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice White
The receiver of the Elmira National Bank, duly appointed by the Comptroller of the Currency, sued George M. Israel, the plaintiff in error, on a promissory note for $17,000, dated New York, May 14,1893, due on demand, and drawn by Israel to the order of the Elmira National Bank, and payable at that bank. The defences to the action were in substance these:
First. That the note had been placed by Israel, the maker, in the hands of David O. Eobinson, without any consideration, for a particular purpose, and that if it had been discounted by Eobinson at the Elmira National Bank such action on his…
2Cited by9 opinions
- Toll v. Monitor Binding & Printing Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
- Nalitzky v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1916
- Earle v. EnosU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1904
- Drake v. MooreDistrict Court, E.D. Illinois · 1936
- Irwin v. WolcottMichigan Supreme Court · 1914
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.