Legal Opinion
Embury v. King
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 13, 2001No. C 01-01448 CWPublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING MOTION TO DISMISS
WILKEN, District Judge.
Defendants move to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). Plaintiff Stephen Embury opposes the motion. The matter was heard on October 26, 2001. Having considered all of the papers filed by the parties and oral argument on the motion, the Court DENIES the motion (Docket # 36).
BACKGROUND
From approximately 1985 to December 31, 1999, Plaintiff Stephen Embury was employed as an Associate Professor in Residence at the University of California, San Francisco, School of Medicine. Plaintiff contends that his employment at…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Jena Balistreri v. Pacifica Police Department Al Olsen, Police Chief, Individually and as a Police AgentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re Apple Computer, Inc., Securities LitigationDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2002
- Natural Resources Defense Council v. PattersonDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2004
- Guru Nanak Sikh Society of Yuba City v. County of SutterDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2003
- Kvassay v. HastyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
- NORTH PACIFICA, LLC. v. City of PacificaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.