Legal Opinion
Stacy Debnam v. Gay and Loudermilk Engineers, Inc.
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)
Decided October 15, 2024No. 14-23-00954-CVPublished
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 15, 2024 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-23-00954-CV STACY DEBNAM, Appellant V. GAY AND LOUDERMILK ENGINEERS, INC., Appellee On Appeal from the 129th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2023-24101 MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se appellant Stacy Debnam appeals the trial court’s order dismissing her case because she failed to attach a certificate of merit to her petition alleging claims against appellee Gay and Loudermilk Engineers, Inc. (Engineers). See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code § 150.002 (mandating dismissal of claim…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Crosstex Energy Services, L.P. v. Pro Plus, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2014
- City of Dallas v. Tci West End, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2015
- Smalling v. GardnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2005
- Richard Hebert and Janet Hebert v. Timothy E. Hopkins, M.D., and Shannon Clinic, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2013
- Pakal Enterprises, INC. and Rene Dominguez v. Lesak Enterprises, L.L.C. DBA Pro Surv and Toby P. Couchman, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2011
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.