Legal Opinion

Pakal Enterprises, INC. and Rene Dominguez v. Lesak Enterprises, L.L.C. DBA Pro Surv and Toby P. Couchman

Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)

Decided April 28, 2011No. 01-09-01038-CVPublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EVELYN V. KEYES, Justice.

Appellants, Pakal Enterprises, Inc. (“Pakal”) and Rene Dominguez, appeal the trial court’s dismissal of their suit against appellees, Lesak Enterprises LLC d/b/a Pro Surv and Toby P. Couchman (collectively, “Lesak”), for failure to comply with Chapter 150 of the Texas Civil Practice and Remedies Code. In three issues, Pakal and Dominguez argue that the trial court erred in (1) determining that their original petition was filed on March 6, 2009 and that they were not entitled to the 30-day extension of the deadline provided for by section 150.002(b); (2)…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Walker v. PackerTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of San Antonio v. City of BoerneTexas Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Fleming Foods of Texas, Inc. v. RylanderTexas Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Landreth v. Las Brisas Council of Co-Owners, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2009
  5. Sharp Engineering v. Luis, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bruington Engineering, LTD. v. Pedernal Energy, L.L.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2013
  2. Pelco Construction, Inc. v. Dannenbaum Engineering Corp.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2013
  3. Pro Plus, Inc. v. Crosstex Energy Services, L.P., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2012
  4. JJW Development, L.L.C. v. Strand Systems Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 2012
  5. Toby Paul Couchman and Pro-Surv v. Elizabeth Cardona, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)2015

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API