Legal Opinion

Lambert v. Austin Ind.

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided October 7, 2008No. 07-10651PublishedCited by 98 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TJOFLAT, Circuit Judge:

In this case, an individual has sued his former employer for alleged age and race discrimination, as well as retaliatory termination. The question before us is whether the claims he has brought should be resolved through the company’s arbitration policy or in the federal courts. 1 In addressing this issue, we need only apply basic contract interpretation principles in harmony with a general federal policy in favor of arbitration. In so doing, we hold that the district court erred in denying the employer’s motion to compel arbitration. The employer’s arbitration policy…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Lee Caley v. Gulfstream Aerospace Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2005
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,610 Joe Goldberg v. Bear, Stearns & Co., Inc., and Michael S. GorinskyCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1990
  3. United States v. Christopher B. Messino, Christopher R. Messino, and Clement A. MessinoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Moreno v. StricklandCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Kemira, Inc. v. Williams Investigative & Security Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1994

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by98 opinions

  1. Valencia v. SmythCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
  2. Brubaker v. BarrettDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2011
  3. Perera v. H & R Block Eastern Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2012
  4. Baptist Hosp. of Miami, Inc. v. Medica Healthcare Plans, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2019
  5. Caban v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2009

93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API