Mutual Security Co. v. Sidney Blumenthal & Co.
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Action to recover of the defendant the amount of an assessment against it made by the plaintiff to pay for losses incurred by it upon its policies of “strike insurance” so-called, brought to the Superior Court in New Haven County and tried to the jury before Williams, J., who directed a verdict for the defendant, from the judgment upon which the plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the CourtWheeler, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the refusal of the court to direct a verdict in its favor and for the direction of a verdict for the defendant. The plaintiff is a mutual insurance company authorized by its charter (14 Special Laws, p. 181) to insure against loss or damage from the interruption or suspension of business by reason of strikes, at such rates and for such terms as it may determine; and it may require the further agreement to pay such sum or sums as may be assessed against each policy-holder to pay for losses or expenses accruing during the term of the policy, not exceeding five times…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Ionia, Eaton & Barry Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance v. DavisMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Farmers' Mutual Fire Insurance Co. of Palmyra v. KnightIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
- Taylor v. DeveauxMichigan Supreme Court · 1894
- Planters' Insurance v. ComfortMississippi Supreme Court · 1874
- Commonwealth v. Mechanics Mutual Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Commonwealth Ex Rel. Schnader v. Keystone Indemnity ExchangeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Commonwealth v. Keystone Indemnity Exchange, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Dauphin County1938