Legal Opinion

Brigham v. First Nat. Bank of Arizona

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided March 2, 1981No. 2 CA-CIV 3762PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.

This case presents us with the issue of whether A.R.S. Sec. 33-741, which provides grace periods for forfeiture of the interest of purchasers under contracts for the conveyance of real property, applies to a straight cash transaction and therefore allows a defaulting purchaser extra time in which to close the sale. We hold that it does not and affirm the judgment entered below for seller.

On June 27, 1979, appellee First National Bank of Arizona (seller) and appellants (purchasers) executed a series of instruments which together may be considered a contract of sale…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Mohave County v. Mohave-Kingman Estates, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Mortenson v. Financial Growth, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Hassenpflug v. HartArizona Supreme Court · 1961
  4. Lundstrom v. HacklColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. Coble v. SchererCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ralph and Carolee Thomas v. Montelucia VillasArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bishop Ryan High School v. LindbergNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Bob Acres, LLC v. Schumacher Farms, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Wendy's of Montana v. LarsenMontana Supreme Court · 1982
  5. Arizona Board of Regents v. Main Street Mesa AssociatesCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1994

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API