Legal Opinion

Wendy's of Montana v. Larsen

Montana Supreme Court

Decided February 11, 1982No. 81-225PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shea

Plaintiff, Wendy’s of Montana, appeals from a summary judgment granted by Missoula District Court, the effect of which was to permit the defendants, William T. and Helen J. Larsen, to keep a $22,750 earnest money payment which Wendy’s had paid to the Larsens under a contract to purchase land. The Larsens, in turn, were purchasing the land under a contract for deed from William and Dorothy Riggert and Anita Taylor.

Wendy’s contends that summary judgment was improperly granted because the Larsens failed to perform a condition precedent to the contract. This contention is based on a contingency…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. O. F. Hallman and Wife, Laura L. Hallman, and Robert D. Mitchell, and Wife, Sylvia R. Mitchell v. Safeway Stores, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Brigham v. First Nat. Bank of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  3. Lundstrom v. HacklColorado Court of Appeals · 1978
  4. Coble v. SchererCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  5. Petersen Sheep & Cattle Co. v. MossMontana Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arrowhead Sch. Dist. 75, Park Co. v. KlyapMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Payne Realty & Housing, Inc. v. First Security BankMontana Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Yellowstone II Development Group, Inc. v. First American Title InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Bender v. RosmanMontana Supreme Court · 2023
  5. Arrowhead Sch. Dist. 75, Park Co. v. KlyapMontana Supreme Court · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API