Legal Opinion
Gill v. Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I
District Court, W.D. New York
Decided March 3, 2014No. 6:09-CV-6043(MAT)PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
DECISION AND ORDER
MICHAEL A. TELESCA, District Judge.
I. Introduction
Daniel E. Gill (“Gill”), Thomas C. McDermott (“McDermott”), and Jay T. Holmes (“Holmes”) (hereinafter, collectively, “Plaintiffs”) are retired Bausch & Lomb Incorporated (“B & L”) executives and are the sole participants in the Bausch & Lomb Supplemental Retirement Income Plan I (“the Plan” or “SERP I”). Represented by counsel, Plaintiffs’ instituted this action pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 1001 et seq. (“ERISA”), challenging Defendants’ termination of their monthly…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. GlennSupreme Court of the United States · 2008
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- D'Iorio v. Winebow, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Easter v. Cayuga Medical Center at Ithaca Prepaid Health PlanDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 2016
- Meidl v. Aetna, Inc.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2018
- Cohen v. Liberty Mut. Grp. Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2019
- Derogatis v. Board of Trustees of Central Pension Fund of the International Union of Operating EngineersDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2016
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.