Legal Opinion

In re the Detention of V.B.

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 15, 2001No. 25603-7-IIPublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSeinfeld, J.

The parties ask us to decide whether either procedural due process or the civil commitment statutes require the State to prove at the 14-day commitment hearing that the officer who initially detained V.B. had reasonable cause to believe that she was mentally ill and presented either an imminent likelihood of serious harm or was gravely disabled at the time of the initial detention. We conclude that the law does not require this proof and, consequently, affirm.

*956FACTS

At 9:30 p.m. on January 17, 2000, Vancouver Police Officer Sharma delivered V.B. to the Southwest Washington Medical Center for a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. In Re the Detention of LaBelleWashington Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Diamond v. CrossWashington Supreme Court · 1983
  4. In Re the Detention SwansonWashington Supreme Court · 1990
  5. Dunner v. McLaughlinWashington Supreme Court · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. ConteWashington Supreme Court · 2007
  2. In Re Detention of CWWashington Supreme Court · 2002
  3. In re the Detention of C.W.Washington Supreme Court · 2002
  4. Hough v. StockbridgeCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2002
  5. In Re Detention of VBCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API