Legal Opinion

People v. Sullivan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided June 10, 1976PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum. Although appellant’s counsel sought to present a defense of insanity, appellant stated that he did not desire to raise such defense and specifically refused to cooperate with both defense and prosecution psychiatrists. As a consequence, the trial court properly precluded the appellant from introducing into evidence psychiatric testimony that would support this defense. (Matter of Lee v County Ct. of Erie County, 27 NY2d 432, 443, cert den 404 US 823.) The trial court also instructed the jury that the presumption of sanity had not been overcome and that appellant was presumed to be…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lee v. County Ct. of Erie CountyNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. People v. SilverNew York Court of Appeals · 1974
  3. People v. . HochNew York Court of Appeals · 1896
  4. People v. KellyNew York Court of Appeals · 1951

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. People v. SegalNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. People v. PicozziAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. People v. DyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. People v. McMillanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  5. People v. Morgan, New York County Courts1998

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API