Legal Opinion
Fuller v. Pacheco
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
Decided January 16, 2001No. 93,222PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COLBERT, J.
T1 Sharylin and C.A. Fuller appeal the trial court's orders denying their motions for judgment notwithstanding the verdiet and a new trial, and awarding attorney fees and costs to Appellees, Steven Pacheco and Vick-rey Heating and Air Conditioning, Inc. There are three issues on appeal in this tort action-whether the trial court erred in: (1) denying the Fullers' motion for judgment notwithstanding the verdict; (2) denying the Fullers' motion for a new trial; and (8) setting the amount of the attorney fees and costs award. We conclude that, while the trial court did not err…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Tarasoff v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Wofford v. Eastern State HospitalSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1990
- Delbrel v. Doenges Bros. Ford, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Green Bay Packaging v. Preferred Packaging, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
- Calvetti v. SeippIllinois Supreme Court · 1967
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Heffron v. District Court of Oklahoma CountySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2003
- Boston Avenue Management, Inc. v. Associated Resources, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2007
- Kikuchi v. BrownHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2006
- Hubbard v. Kaiser-Francis Oil Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
- Flood Control District v. Paloma Investment Ltd. PartnershipCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.