Legal Opinion

Ohio Leather Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided November 12, 1930No. 5393PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The petitioner, the leather company, began, in 1922, to- put upon the market a certain kind or brand of leather under the trade-name of “Kaffor-Kid,” 1 and, at the time of the filing of the complaint by the Commission, a large trade therein had been developed. This leather is made only from the skins of calves, not more than twelve days old and called “deacons,” which have been fed entirely on milk and have not begun to eat grass. The leather so made is softer in its texture and more delicate and pliable than that which is made from the skin of older calves—the standard…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Berkey & Gay Furniture Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Transcontinental Bus Service, Inc. v. CarmodyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1949
  2. New American Library of World Literature, Inc. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1954
  3. Royal Milling Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Kerran v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959
  5. Kerran v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1959

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API