Legal Opinion

Royal Milling Co. v. Federal Trade Commission

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided May 4, 1932No. 5958, 6098-6102PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SIMONS, Circuit Judge.

Nashville, Tenn., if not the center of the flour industry in the South, is at least the largest center of the self-rising flour industry in the South, if not in the world. The six petitioners are all located in Nashville; they sell self-rising flour throughout the Southeastern States, in interstate commerce, and have built up a substantial industry. If not originators of the process of mixing self-rising flour, nor even its first producers, they were undoubtedly early in the field, and in some respeets pioneers in the industry; one of the petitioners having commenced…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Raladam Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. KlesnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  3. Federal Trade Commission v. Winsted Hosiery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  4. L. B. Silver Co. v. Federal Trade Commission of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1923
  5. Raladam Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Brown Fence & Wire Co. v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1933
  2. Federal Trade Commission v. Mid West Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API