O'Toole v. Hughes-Foulkrod Co.
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam,
This is a Workmen’s Compensation Case.
On February 5, 1930, the referee had awarded compensation and in the order directed: “It is further ordered that the claimant must have medical attention in the form of dental work, which work must be completed within sixty (60) days or compensation ceases. ’ ’ This finding was approved by the Board on April 4, 1930. On June 8, 1931 a petition was presented to terminate on the ground that the claimant did not comply with the order of the referee to have dental work done within sixty (60) days following February 5, 1930. There has been no…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Parlovich v. Philadelphia & Reading Coal & Iron Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hanyok v. Pennsylvania Coal & Coke Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Visnic v. Westmoreland Coal Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
- Bird v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945