Legal Opinion
Remington Rand, Inc. v. American Export Lines, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided May 11, 1955PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RYAN, District Judge.
Libellants, each by separate suit, seek to recover for loss and damage to cargo shipped at New York in November and December, 1948 aboard the S.S. Examiner for carriage to Bombay, India; the six suits filed, alleging total cargo losses of $233,375, have been consolidated for trial.
It has been stipulated that libellants were the owners of cargo and holders of bills of lading issued therefor, and that the cargo sustained damage. It is not questioned that the cargo was delivered to respondent in New York in good order and condition and that respondent accepted the shipments…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Bisso v. Inland Waterways Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Boston Metals Co. v. the Winding GulfSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Bank Line, Ltd. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1928
- Anderson v. LorentzenCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Federal Ins. v. American Export Lines, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1953
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Caterpillar Overseas, S.A., Libellant-Appellant v. S.S. Expeditor and American Export Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963
- Wirth Limited and Hoesch Siegerlandwerke A. G. Siegen v. S/s Acadia Forest and Lash Barge No. Cg-204, Eurogulf Lines D/B/A Central Gulf Contramar LineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- Isthmian Steamship Company, a Corporation v. California Spray-Chemical Corporation, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1961
- Leather's Best Inc. v. S.S. MormaclynxDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1970
- B. Elliott (Canada) Ltd. v. John T. Clark & Son of Maryland, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.