Legal Opinion
Bailey v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of Va.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided October 31, 1994No. 2:94cv897PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
CLARKE, District Judge.
This case is currently before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment pursuant to Rule 56(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. For the following reasons, Plaintiffs motion is GRANTED and Defendant’s motion is DENIED. A Permanent Injunction is also issued against the Defendant enjoining it from denying coverage for high dose chemotherapy, radiation treatment and the hospitalization associated with such treatment.
FACTS
Mary Bailey, Plaintiff, was diagnosed with breast cancer in 1990. In 1994, Plaintiffs cancer metastasized so as to become stage IV…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- John Doe Firm Doe v. Group Hospitalization & Medical Services, D/B/A Blue Cross and Blue Shield of the National Capital AreaCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
- Daniel Kunin v. Benefit Trust Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Nehi Bottling Company, Incorporated v. All-American Bottling Corporation, John Armes v. All-American Bottling CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1993
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Kopicki v. Fitzgerald Automotive Family Employee Benefits PlanDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2000
- Bailey v. Blue Cross/Blue Shield of VirginiaDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1995