Legal Opinion
Kopicki v. Fitzgerald Automotive Family Employee Benefits Plan
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided November 22, 2000No. Civ. A. AW-00-2757PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Judge.
Currently pending before the Court are several motions submitted both parties. Of the most significant pending motions, Plaintiffs, Chester and Patricia Garner Ko-pieki, have moved to enjoin Defendants from denying preauthorization coverage for cancer therapies recommended to treat Mr. Kopicki’s multiple myeloma. Defendants have moved for summary judgment on Count I Plaintiffs’ claim for coverage and for judgment on the pleadings as to Count II-Plaintiffs’ claim for breach of fiduciary duties. On November 17, 2000, the Court held a hearing on the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Varity Corp. v. HoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Blackwelder Furniture Company of Statesville, Inc. v. Seilig Manufacturing Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1977
- Direx Israel, Ltd. Direx, Incorporated v. Breakthrough Medical Corporation Zvi Porath Avner SpectorCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1992
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Difelice v. Aetna U.S. HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Sawyer v. Potash Corp. of SaskatchewanDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2006
- Hoyle v. Liberty Life Assur. Co. of Boston Inc.District Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2003
- Difelice v. Aetna HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003
- Difelice v. Aetna U.S. HealthcareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2003