Manocchio v. Kusserow
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
HATCHETT, Circuit Judge:
We affirm the district court’s ruling that 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7, a mandatory exclusionary provision, is not punitive in nature thereby violating the Double Jeopardy and Ex Post Facto Clauses of the United States Constitution. 768 F.Supp. 814.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Val Manocchio, a medical doctor, is licensed to practice medicine in the state of Florida. For approximately ten weeks in 1984, Manocchio worked on a part-time basis at a facility known as Florida Medical Consultants. During his employment, Ma-nocchio supervised particular tests and medical procedures…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Ulysses Sympson Reed, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1991
- Billie Matthews and William R. Matthews v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972
- Greene v. SullivanDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1990
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Doe v. PoritzSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
- United States v. Robert S. StollerCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- State Ex Rel. Schwartz v. KennedyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1995
- Bruce L. Erickson, M.D., and Great Falls Eye Surgery Center v. United States of America, Ex Rel., Department of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Loui v. Board of Medical ExaminersHawaii Supreme Court · 1995
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.