Legal Opinion

Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Born

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1911No. 7,361PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Action by Edward Bom and another against the Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago and St. Louis Railway Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtIbach, P. J.

Appellees, Edward Bom and Theresa Bom, partners doing a coal, wood and' ice business under the firm name of Samuel Bom & Co., sued appellant for damages, caused by the act of appellant on November 12, 1905, in unlawfully and wrongfully entering upon the premises oc*64cupied by appellees under a lease, and used by them in conducting their said business, and destroying certain buildings thereon, and certain personal property ‘consisting of a traction engine and other machinery, some harness, oats, corn, hay, coal and coke. Issues were formed upon the amended complaint of appellees and appellant’s…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Allison v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1863
  2. City of Teree Haute v. HudnutIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  3. Bristol Hydraulic Co. v. BoyerIndiana Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Stubbings v. Village of EvanstonIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
  5. Duffield v. Rosenzweig, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Warren County1891

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Indiana Pipe Line Co. v. ChristensenIndiana Supreme Court · 1919
  2. Indiana State Highway Commission v. PappasIndiana Court of Appeals · 1976
  3. Illinois Pipe Line Co. v. CoffmanIndiana Court of Appeals · 1933
  4. Ingram v. Jeffersonville, New Albany & Sellersburg Rapid Transit Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1917
  5. City of Richmond v. Land-Dilks Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API