Legal Opinion

In Re Phenylpropanolamine (Ppa) Products Liab. Lit.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided January 13, 2003No. C01-2186, MDL NO. 1407PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

344 F.Supp.2d 686 (2003)

In re: PHENYLPROPANOLAMINE (PPA) PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION,

Alvis

v.

Glaxosmithkline, et al.,

Nos. C01-2186, MDL NO. 1407.

United States District Court, W.D. Washington at Seattle.

January 13, 2003.

Antriss Edward, Thomas Jason Taylor, LaDonna Curto, Jo Hill, Rezso Horvath, Marta Kuehne, Anne Marie Mancebo.Jessica Black, Charles Michael Brumley, Nancy Brumley, Shirley Jean Byers, Robin Cooke, Karen Dancey, Tommy Dancey, Bonita DeMoss, Roland DeMoss, Sr., Loreta Eslin, R.D. Eslin, Diola Garza, Pedro Garza, Bobbie Ray Gentry, Lisa Grantham, Roger Grantham, James Harris,…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. Planned Parenthood Southeast, Inc. v. BentleyDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 2015
  3. City of Greenville v. Syngenta Crop Protection, Inc.District Court, S.D. Illinois · 2011
  4. Viskase Companies, Inc. v. World Pac International AGDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010
  5. Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API