Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Bauman v. DaimlerChrysler Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 28, 2009No. 07-15386Published

1Opinion of the Court

579 F.3d 1088 (2009)

Barbara BAUMAN; Gregory Grieco; Josefina Nunez; Gabriele Nunez; Miriam Nunez; Silvia Nunez; Emilio Guillermo Pesce; Mirta Haydee Arenas; Graciela Gigena; Guillermo Alberto Gigena; Nuria Gigena; Amelia Schiaffo; Elba Leichner; Anunciacion Spaltro De Belmonte; Hector Ratto; Eduardo Olasiregui; Ricardo Martin Hoffman; Eduardo Estiville; Alfredo Manuel Martin; Juan Jose Martin; Jose Barreiro; Alejandro Daer, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

DAIMLERCHRYSLER CORPORATION; Daimlerchrysler AG, Defendant-Appellee.

No. 07-15386.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Asahi Metal Industry Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Solano Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Ruhrgas Ag v. Marathon Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1999

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API